Edit
Silje Aambø Langvatn
Foto: Erik Fossen

Silje Aambø Langvatn

Stilling

Førsteamanuensis

Tilhørighet

E-post
silje.langvatn@uib.no
Telefonnummer
+47 55582732
Besøksadresse
Parkveien 9
5007 Bergen
Postadresse
Postboks 7805
5020 Bergen

Silje Aambø Langvatn

Stilling

Førsteamanuensis

Tilhørighet

Forskergrupper

Forskning

Silje A. Langvatn er førsteamanuensis i politisk filosofi ved Senter for vitskapsteori (SVT). Ho har tidlegare hatt stilling som postdoktor ved SVT, postdoktor ved PluriCourts, Universitet i Oslo, Law& Philosophy fellow ved Yale Law School (2016) og Visiting Fellow ved Harvard Government Department (2009).

Formidling

 

Undervisning

Emneansvarlig VITHF900 Vitenskapsteori og Etikk for PhD-kandidatar ved Humanistisk Fakultet og Griegakademiet

Forelesingar på VITSV900 Vitenskapsteori og Etikk for PhD-kandidatar ved Samfunnsvitenskapelig fakultet

Forelesingar på MNF490 Vitenskapsteori for PhD-kandidatar ved MatNat-fakultetet

Publikasjoner
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2005
2004
2001

Se en full oversikt over publikasjoner i Cristin

Nyaste publikasjonar

Langvatn, S.A. (2024) Political legitimacy in Rawls’ Early and Late Political Liberalism – Two Diverging Interpretations. Philosophy & Social Criticism 2024 s. -
UiB 

This article is part of a special issue on Frank I. Michelman's recent book Constitutional Essentials (2022). It examines Michelman's interpretation of Rawls two conceptions of legitimacy –"The Liberal principle of legitimacy" and the later "Idea of political legitimacy based on the criterion of reciprocity" – and argues that Michelman's offers an interesting interpretation which suceeds in bringing out the distinctly institutional and practice-dependent nature of Rawls' way of understanding legitimacy. However, I go on to argue that Michelman's interpretation is too proceduralistic, and that it fails to grasp the most interesting developments in Rawls' latest conception of legitimacy (Rawls 1996-1997).

Langvatn, S.A. & Holst, C. (2022) Expert accountability: What does it mean, why is it challenging—and is it what we need? Constellations 00, 1– 16

When mistakes are made in political life, a standard remedy is to find someone to hold to account. But when experts who take part in governance make mistakes, they are seldom the ones who are held to account. So, is the solution to make these «unaccountable experts» more accountable? Not so quick, we argue. Case: The severe expert mistakes made in the preparation of the impact assessment report for opening the South Eastern Barents Sea for petroleum activity.

Holst, C., & Langvatn, S. A. (2021). Descriptive representation of women in international courts. Journal of Social Philosophy, 00, 1– 18

In a new article, Cathrine Holst and I revisit Mansbridge's article, "Should Blacks Represent Blacks, and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes" (Jane Mansbridge 1999), which presented a systematic framework for evaluating the costs and benefits of such descriptive representation. Mansbridge developed her framework with elected assemblies in mind.

We look at how the calculus changes when the question is descriptive representation of women in international courts. For this type of institution, we argue, some of the costs of descriptive representation become costlier, and some of the benefits become weaker.

Publikasjonsoversikt i Cristin