New publication of the CNA group
Michael Baumgartner's paper on "Qualitative Comparative Analysis and robust sufficiency" was published in Quality & Quantity (2021): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01157-z
![logo](https://www.uib.no/sites/w3.uib.no/files/styles/content_main/public/media/qq.jpg?itok=d8NyKIt1×tamp=1624434428)
Hovedinnhold
Qualitative Comparative Analysis and robust sufficiency
Some methodologists take the search target of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to be causal INUS-conditions, others contend that QCA should instead be used to search for some form of sufficiency that is more substantive than mere Boolean sufficiency. While the notion of an INUS-condition has a long and uncontroversial definitional history, Adrian Dusa, in a recent paper, is the first to explicitly define a notion of substantive sufficiency, which he labels robust sufficiency. Dusa’s definition, however, is vacuous in real-life research contexts. As an alternative, the first part of this paper non-vacuously defines robust sufficiency and supplies a corresponding notion of minimality, which—I argue—captures Dusa’s conceptual intentions. In the second part, I then report and discuss the results of a series of simulation experiments benchmarking the performance of the different QCA solution types in recovering robust sufficiency and minimality.