A. To map and investigate ethical and societal issues that are emerging from the complex interplay between nature and culture in the development and use of nanotechnology.
Kjølberg, K. and Wickson, F. (2007) ‘Social and Ethical Interactions with Nano: Mapping the early literature’ Nanoethics 1:2, pp. 89-104.
Kjølberg, K. and Wickson, F. (2009). ‘Nano meets Macro: Social perspectives on nanoscale sciences and technologies’, (Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore).
Wickson, F. and Kjølberg, K. (2009) ‘NanoVisions: An Experiment with NanoScientists’ in Visions of Nanotechnology (eds) Stefan Gammel and Arianna Ferrari (AKA Verlag: Berlin) pp. 165-183.
B. To develop an interdisciplinary understanding of scientific uncertainty and the quality of the knowledge that is the basis for regulation and management. Especially an understanding of the responsibility of different actors, the importance of risk and uncertainty analysis, non-scientific knowledge as a basis for decision-making and the participatory methods used to deal with uncertainty in decision-making and management.
Wickson, F. (2007) ‘Public engagement means listening as well as talking’ Nature 448/9, p. 644.
Gillund, F., Wickson, F. and Myhr, A., ‘The Goverence of Nanoparticles: Science, Risk, Uncertainty and Precaution' in Kjølberg and Wickson (2009) Nano meets Macro: Social perspectives on nanoscale sciences and technologies, (Pan Standford Publishing, Singapore).
Kjølberg, K. and Strand, R. ’European Strategies for Regulating Nanoparticles’, in van der Sluijs, J., Ravetz, J. and Kjølberg, K. (eds). ‘Innovative approaches for the governance of complex science and technology issues: Towards a post normal practice’, coming in 2009.
C. To research the existence and meaning of “spontaneous philosophy” and ideology for scientific, public and policy discourses.
Science:
Wickson, F. ‘Narratives of Nature & Nanotechnology’ (2008) Nature Nanotechnology 3(6), pp. 313-315.
Wickson, F., Grieger, K. and Baun, A. (to be published soon) ‘Nature and Nanotechnology: science, ideology and policy’, in Kenneth A. Gould & Robert J. Torres (eds.) Nanotechnology, Social Change and the Environment (Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham).
Policy:
Kjølberg, K., Strand, R., Delgado, G.C. and Wickson, F. (2008) ‘Models of Governance for Converging Technologies’ Technology Assessment and Strategic Management 20(1), pp. 83-97.
Public:
Kjølberg, K. ‘Representations of nanotechnology in Norwegian newspapers - implications for public participation’, NanoEthics, coming in April 2009.
Kjølberg, K. ’Nanoteknologi i norsk offentlighet’, Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift, 3/2008, pp. 252-261.
Kjølberg, K. ’Vidunderlig ny nanoteknologi’, editorial in Morgenbladet, 19.09.2008.
Kjølberg, K. ‘Representations of nanotechnology in the public sphere’, in Kjølberg, K. and Wickson, F. (2009) Nano meets Macro:Social perspectives on nanoscale sciences and technologies, (Pan Standford Publishing, Singapore).
D. To explore the state of scientific knowledge in published examples of nano-science philosophy, as well as nano-scientists’ understanding of the ethical and societal implications of their work.
Wickson, F., Nepstad, R., Am, T. and Winkler, M. (2008) ‘Reflections on Philosophy of Nanoscience from Nanoscience Practitioners’ Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics (Etikk i Praksis) 2(2), pp. 73-92.
E. To develop a richer theoretical understanding by improving the communication and flow of theoretical insights across the “two cultures” of nanoscience / technology and humanities/social science-based research in nano.