Coursework (training component)
The coursework amounts to 30 credits, and must be completed and approved before the dissertation can be submitted.
Main content
The candidate must complete a training component in scientific method, theory, theory of science, and ethics that provides depth and breadth in their own subject, while at the same time putting the subject into a wider framework. In the PhD education, the candidate must also be required to communicate scientific work to colleagues, students, and the public (cf. § 2-2)
The training component should provide training in professional communication and an introduction to research ethics, scientific theory and scientific method. The training component must, together with the research work, contribute to achieving the expected learning outcomes in the current faculty's PhD program and in line with the national qualification framework (cf. § 7-2)
The supervisor is responsible for giving advice on the training part (cf. § 6-3). The candidate and supervisor must prepare a plan for the training part, which must be approved by the department/centre management. Any changes to the plan will be followed up in connection with progress reports and mid-term evaluation
The training component of the research program consists of 30 credits, of which at least 20 credits must be taken after admission. Elements to be included in the training section must not normally be older than five (5) years at the date of admission (cf. § 7-2).
15 credits must be taken as compulsory courses offered at the faculty.
- Scientific theory and ethics – 10 credits
- Literature Review and Publication – 5 ECTS
It is possible to apply to the faculty for admission (prior approval) of external courses, to replace the compulsory courses.
- The application must be justified based on the candidate's project.
- It must be documented that the learning outcome of the external course is equivalent to the course being replaced.
1. VITHF900 Theory of Science and Ethics
PhD candidates at the Faculty of Humanities submitted to the programme after 20/6/2023 must aquire 10 credits in scientific theory and ethics by taking the course VITHF900.
Candidates with admission before 20/6/2023 have, during a transitional period, the opportunity to complete the compulsory part according to the old scheme (see transitional scheme on the right). The old scheme allows the candidate to choose between 5 and 10 credits in scientific theory and ethics. This is achieved by taking VITHF905 (5 credits), and possibly building on with VITHF910 (5 credits), or by taking VITHF900 (10 credits).
The academic responsibility for all these courses lies with SVT - Center for Science Theory.
It is possible to apply for integration (prior approval) of other courses with equivalent learning outcomes.
2. PHDOF903 Literature review and publishing for PhD candidates
PHDOF903 - Literature review and publishing for PhD candidates
Access to the course unit: The course is open to PhD candidates at the Faculty of Humanities and is best suited for candidates at an early stage of their PhD. Candidates lacking 5 compulsory ECTS points in generic skills will be given priority if the number of applicants surpasses the capacity. Maximum 18 participants.
Teaching semester: fall 2024
Credit: 5 ECTS points
Language of instruction: English
Course co-ordinator: Faculty of Humanities
Course leader: Michael Grote
Deadline for registration: August 15, 2024
Objectives and content: The starting point of this course is the «overview of research in the field», the literature review. Through this course the PhD candidate will write a draft of this literature review for her/his dissertation. The goal of the course is that each candidate, early on in the research process, gains a confident overview of existing research fields, of crucial literature and of different information resources. The course will offer a review of basic reference management functionality and show how this can be used as efficiently as possible in the work. The candidates are required to use a reference management system in the written assignment for this course. Furthermore, the course aims to enable the candidate to keep an active dialogue with relevant literature throughout the research process and to introduce him/her to problems of communication of research results such as publishing procedures and channels, research networks, copyright issues and evaluation of research.
Learning outcomes: On completion of the course the student has expertise in searching literature for aims of research, in relating his/her own work to actual fields of research and in communicating own results by publishing in different channels. In detail, the student
- is acquainted with standard tools and methods of literature search
- is able to develop a search strategy for his project and is familiar with the use of the most important specialist databases for his/her subject
- has a confident overview of existing fields of research related to his/her own project and of different information resources and research networks
- knows how to cite, how to evaluate sources and how to relate to research discourse in an ethically proper way
- is able to write a literature review for his/her own research project and to keep an active dialogue with relevant literature through the research process
- is able to use a reference management system when referencing in a text and to generate literature lists in different referencing styles
- is acquainted with different formal and informal channels of publication on his field of research, and with different procedures of peer review, criteria for ranking and other forms of research evaluation
- is able to identify publishers for his/her articles or monographs, and online venues for networking
- is aware of copyright issues and has gained basic knowledge about different sources of research funding
Required Previous Knowledge: Basic knowledge of a reference management tool
Teaching methods and extent of organized Teaching: The course consists of introductory lectures, seminar discussions, tutorials and exercises. Joint sessions: 4 days of full-time seminar (3+1 days with approx. 5 weeks in-between). The organized teaching in the course has an extent of approximately 20 hours.
- September 10 (9.00-15.00): Introduction to the library; literature search and reviewing literature. On the first day of the course every student present aims and challenges concerning the literature review of his/her PhD project
- September 11 (9.00-15.00): Literature search and reference management
- September 12 (9.00-15.00): Research workflow and reference management Writing process, types of reviews, the dissertation genre
2 weeks of workshop: Individual work on literature review, peer-to-peer reviewing on Mitt UiB, individual tutorials with the academic librarians at the University of Bergen Library.
- October 16 (9.00-15.00): Publishing, research integrity, and open science
Compulsory assignements and attendance: Attendance at the seminar is mandatory.
In preparation of the course, every student should find and read a dissertation, identify strengths and weaknesses regarding literature review and structure of thesis. Furthermore, every student should prepare a brief presentation of her/his PhD-project. The presentation should be concise (about 2-3 minutes) and give an account of the thesis topic and of the aims and challenges concerning the literature review of the project
Forms of assessment: A written assignment of 2000 words must be submitted approximately 4 weeks after the course is finished. The assignment should consist of a literature review that can be used as a stand-alone part (chapter or article) of the individual dissertation. In addition, a separate reflection of the writing process (literature search, reference management, reviewing) must be included. The assignment must be written in English, German or a Scandinavian Language. At least 500 pages of research literature from at least 10 different sources must be reviewed. A reference management system must be used in the assignment.
Place of instruction: Bergen University Library
3. Candidate-spesific courses
The candidate-specific training component must ensure that the candidates fulfil the requirements of the PhD regulations for the training component, beyond the content already covered by the compulsory courses.
The candidate-specific training component must therefore cover the following (cf. section 2-2 of the regulations):
- professional method and theory that provides depth and breadth in one's own field of research
- training in dissemination of scientific work
The department/centre is responsible for ensuring that the candidate-specific training component contributes to meeting the requirements of the regulations. This must be ensured both through the candidate's plan for the training component and any follow-up in progress reports and midway evaluation.
- Credit-giving activities may include:
- PhD courses under the auspices of UiB, research schools or other accredited institutions
- Participation with presentations at conferences and seminars
- Instrumental courses and courses with particular relevance to the thesis work (In the case of approval of courses from a lower level, credits reduction must be considered.)
- Mediation work
The following activities do NOT pay off in the training component:
- presentation of thesis chapters at internal seminars
- stays abroad
- duty work
- midway evaluation
- final seminar (master class)
Guidelines for the approval of the training component
The training part must be completed and approved before the dissertation is submitted. All activity must be adequately documented. Requirements for documentation can be found under a separate tab on this page. The training part must be approved in its entirety before the candidate can apply for submission. Inadequate documentation can lead to delays in submission.
Approval of the individual parts
Some PhD courses organized at UiB will be pre-approved, and the result is automatically registered on the candidate when the course is completed.
In order to have other activities approved and registered with ECTS credits (also applies to courses at UiB that are not pre-approved to be included in the coursework), the form «Confirmation of part of the training part» is used. The form must be signed by the supervisor and research coordinator at the department. Signed form and documentation is delivered to the local PhD coordinator for control of documentation. After checking, the contact person registers the credits in FS, before the protocol is sent to the faculty for archiving. There is a separate administrative routine for this work.
For courses / activities where there are no pre-calculated credits, the calculation must be made by the supervisor and approved by the department's research coordinator. 1 credit (1 ECTS) corresponds to 26 ⅔ working hours. This applies to all three cycles (bachelor, master and PhD). In addition, the nature of the subject must be taken into account, as well as the level and requirements for previous knowledge, when calculating the scope of work.
Final approval of completed coursework
When the candidate has obtained 30 ECTS credits and these have been registered and visible in Studentweb, the training part must be approved in its entirety. The supervisor and research coordinator carry out this approval on a separate form: "Final approval of completed training part". The signed form is delivered to the contact person for research education in the department administration, who sends it to the faculty together with a transcript showing how the training part is registered in the administratvie database (FS report 727.001).
Final approval of the completed coursewok must normally be in place 6 months before applying for the submission of a doctoral thesis.
Awarding of ECTS credits for conference participation
The main principle for awarding credits for participation in conferences is also based on the rule that 1 credit (1 ECTS) corresponds to 26 ⅔ working hours. On the basis of this, a practice has been established where up to 3 credits can be given for participation in a larger, preferably international, conference with speeches. There is also room to give up to 1 credit for participation in the equivalent without submission, if the program is of particular relevance to the candidate's own project.
Researcher Grand Prix
Participation in the Researcher Grand Prix can be credited with 2 ECTS credits. This was decided by the faculty's program board on 2020-06-10.
Requirement for documentation
In order to have an activity approved as part of the training part, you must first document production and / or presence during an event. Thereafter, the supervisor and the department must approve that the event / production can be included in the training part and how many credits should be awarded.
The training part of the doctoral education is a total of 30 credits, and 15 of these are compulsory. The compulsory credits must be divided between science theory / ethics and transferable skills with a minimum of 5 credits within each category. The 15 remaining credits are determined by the candidate himself in collaboration with the supervisor, but within the framework determined by the faculty's PhD program. Normally, no more than 30 credits shall be included in the training part, and the department shall not approve more credits than is necessary. Under certain conditions, it is possible to allow the training part to exceed this limit by 1-2 credits.
From other educational institutions: Credits taken at other educational institutions in Norway or abroad must be documented with a transcript of records (Norway) or course serifigate from the relevant educational institution. The documentation must be in English or Norwegian.
Courses, conferences and seminars: In order to document courses, conferences, seminars and the like where the organizer does not give credits, you must present proof of participation. This must be a course, conference or seminar certificate which must include the following information:
- organizer's letterhead
- name of participant
- event name, date and duration
- title of any presentation etc.
- organizer's signature
- stamp of the institution (if current)
It is emphasized that the program alone is not considered sufficient documentation
Lectures, articles, and other popular science: Written material must be documented in such a way that it is clear when and how it was published, such as a newspaper page, an entire magazine, etc. If it concerns posts on television or radio, supervisor confirm that this took place. Lectures must be documented by the organizer.
